Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras)

Name: Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) financial statements and ratios
Creator: Annalist

PBR · NYSE · Energy, oil and gas · Brazil · IFRS · Fiscal year ends December

Latest report: FY2025, the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025, released 9 April 2026. Snapshot FY2025_21f63538.

Compare with peers Buyout model Excel JSON

Overview

Revenue, fiscal year

−2.4% year on year

Operating profit, fiscal year

−2.8% year on year

Net income, fiscal year

+161% year on year

Diluted EPS, fiscal year

+162% year on year

Operating margin, fiscal year

−0.1pp year on year

Return on equity, fiscal year

+18.2pp year on year

Select a figure to see the document it came from.

Key Findings

Findings for the latest fiscal year, with their history over earlier years.

Revenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 was US$89.2 billion, 2.4% lower than in the previous fiscal year.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023−2.4% from −10.7% in FY2024
Rule: Revenue against the previous fiscal year · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 was US$89.2 billion, 2.4% lower than in the previous fiscal year.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 WeakenedRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2024 was US$91.4 billion, 10.7% lower than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2023 was US$102.4 billion, 17.7% lower than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · initial
Net income attributable to the company for fiscal 2025 was US$19.6 billion, 160.8% higher than in the previous fiscal year.
Newin FY2025 · first stated
Rule: Net income against the previous fiscal year · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 4 records
1. FY2025 NewNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2025 was US$19.6 billion, 160.8% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2025 RetiredThe finding changed to higher than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
3. FY2024 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2024 was US$7.5 billion, 69.7% lower than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · data update
4. FY2023 NewNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2023 was US$24.9 billion, 32.1% lower than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · initial
The operating margin for fiscal 2025 was 29.3%, 0.1 percentage points lower than a year earlier.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Operating margin against a year earlier · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedThe operating margin for fiscal 2025 was 29.3%, 0.1 percentage points lower than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 WeakenedThe operating margin for fiscal 2024 was 29.4%, 7.7 percentage points lower than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewThe operating margin for fiscal 2023 was 37.1%, 8.7 percentage points lower than a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Return on equity for fiscal 2025 was 29.2%, against 10.9% a year earlier.
Newin FY2025 · first stated
Rule: Return on equity against a year earlier · Sources 20-F 2025-12, 20-F 2024-12
History of this finding, 4 records
1. FY2025 NewReturn on equity for fiscal 2025 was 29.2%, against 10.9% a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2025 RetiredThe finding changed to higher than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
3. FY2024 StrengthenedReturn on equity for fiscal 2024 was 10.9%, against 33.6% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
4. FY2023 NewReturn on equity for fiscal 2023 was 33.6%, against 52.7% a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Net debt was US$63.3 billion at 31 December 2025, 1.5 times EBITDA for fiscal 2025.
Strengthenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Net debt or net cash · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 StrengthenedNet debt was US$63.3 billion at 31 December 2025, 1.5 times EBITDA for fiscal 2025.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedNet debt was US$57.0 billion at 31 December 2024, 1.4 times EBITDA for fiscal 2024.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewNet debt was US$49.9 billion at 31 December 2023, 1.0 times EBITDA for fiscal 2023.Reconstructed · initial

Records before FY2025 are reconstructed from the latest snapshot. Ledger: findings.json.

Credit, liquidity, earnings quality and score findings: Analysis.

Data

Source documents5 documents, latest 20-F for the year to 31 December 2025List

DownloadsExcel workbook · JSON · Brief for AI

SnapshotFY2025_21f63538

Corporate Events

Corporate events are listed for companies whose figures come from 10-K and 10-Q filings; none are listed for this company.

Earnings, Returns and Balance Sheet

Revenue

By fiscal year, US dollars

Operating Profit

By fiscal year, US dollars

Profit Attributable to Owners of the Parent

By fiscal year, US dollars

Margins

By fiscal year, per cent

Returns

By fiscal year, per cent

Net Debt

Total debt less cash and short-term investments, at fiscal year end, US dollars

Diluted Earnings per Share

By fiscal year, as reported

Financial Statements

Figures as filed. Select a figure for its source document and method; a small d marks a figure derived from other figures of the same report.

The statements are loading. They are also available as JSON and CSV.

Ratios

Select a ratio for its formula and the figures it uses, each with its document; (i) gives its definition.

The ratios are loading.

Analysis

Credit update

FY2025

20-F for the year to 31 December 2025, filed 9 April 2026. Changes are against the previous report, and each figure shows its period.

0changes0thresholds crossed

Changes in This Report 0

No finding changed its state in the latest report.

Thresholds Crossed 0

No published finding crosses a threshold.

Fiscal years, with balances at each fiscal year end. Select a value for its formula and the figures it uses.

Credit MetricsDebt to EBITDA 1.69x, FFO to debt 49.3% · FY2025

Lease-adjusted debt, EBITDA and cash flow on the definitions of S&P and Moody's, as far as the filings allow.

Lease-adjusted debt was 1.7 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2025, and funds from operations equalled 49.3% of that debt. Both ratios are within the modest band of the S&P standard volatility table.
Interpretation. Debt to EBITDA shows how many years of EBITDA the debt equals, and FFO to debt the share of the debt that 1 year of cash flow after interest and taxes would repay. The S&P table sorts both into 6 bands; the modest band is number 2 of 6, and a higher number means more debt against earnings.
Confirmedin FY2025 · stated since FY20241.69x from 1.53x in FY2024
Rule: Debt against the S&P benchmark bands · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 4 records
1. FY2025 ConfirmedLease-adjusted debt was 1.7 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2025, and funds from operations equalled 49.3% of that debt. Both ratios are within the modest band of the S&P standard volatility table.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 NewLease-adjusted debt was 1.5 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2024, and funds from operations equalled 50.6% of that debt. Both ratios are within the modest band of the S&P standard volatility table.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2024 RetiredThe finding changed to the modest band.Reconstructed · data update
4. FY2023 NewLease-adjusted debt was 1.2 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2023, and funds from operations equalled 62.8% of that debt. Both ratios are within the minimal band of the S&P standard volatility table.Reconstructed · initial

Position in the S&P Standard Volatility Table, Fiscal 2025

S&P sorts companies into 6 bands by debt against earnings and cash flow, from the least debt to the most.

Debt equals 1.7 years of adjusted EBITDA; a year of funds from operations equals 49.3% of it.

Band	Minimal	Modest	Intermediate	Significant	Aggressive	Highly leveraged
Debt to EBITDA	below 1.5x	1.69x1.5x to 2x	2x to 3x	3x to 4x	4x to 5x	5x and above
FFO to debt	60% and above	49.3%45% to 60%	30% to 45%	20% to 30%	12% to 20%	below 12%

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Lease-adjusted debtBorrowings plus the obligations of long-term leases, such as rents of stores, offices and warehouses, which credit analysts count as debt.Total debt: borrowings + lease liabilities, or the lines that present them together; IFRS 16 puts every lease on the balance sheet
Adjusted EBITDAOperating profit before depreciation, amortisation, the impairment reported with them and pay in shares: the earnings that credit analysts set against debt.EBIT + depreciation and amortisation, with the impairment that the company reports together with them, + share-based payments; depreciation includes that of right-of-use assets, so no lease cost is added
Funds from operationsAdjusted EBITDA less interest and tax paid in cash: the cash the business produces each year for investment, dividends and debt repayment.Adjusted EBITDA - cash interest - cash taxes; cash interest includes the interest on lease liabilities
Debt to EBITDALease-adjusted debt measured in years of adjusted EBITDA. A figure of 3 means debt equals 3 years of those earnings; a lower figure means less debt against earnings.Lease-adjusted debt / adjusted EBITDA	minimal	minimal	minimal	modest	modest
FFO to debtFunds from operations as a share of lease-adjusted debt. A figure of 25% means a year of those funds equals a quarter of the debt; a higher figure means less debt.Funds from operations / lease-adjusted debt	minimal	minimal	minimal	modest	modest
Net debt to adjusted EBITDADebt to EBITDA after cash and short-term investments are set against the debt.(Lease-adjusted debt - cash - short-term investments) / adjusted EBITDA
Operating cash flow to debtOperating cash flow after interest paid, as a share of debt with lease liabilities. A higher share means the debt could be repaid sooner from operating cash.Operating cash flow after interest paid / lease-adjusted debt; interest paid that the company classifies as financing activities is deducted
Retained cash flow to net debtFunds from operations left after dividends, as a share of debt net of cash.(FFO - dividends) / (lease-adjusted debt - cash - short-term investments)
FFO cash interest coverThe number of times cash earnings cover cash interest, lease interest included.(FFO + cash interest) / cash interest; cash interest includes the interest on lease liabilities
EBITDA interest coverThe number of times adjusted EBITDA covers interest, lease interest included.Adjusted EBITDA / finance costs, which include the interest on lease liabilities	n/a
Liquid assets to debtCash and short-term investments as a share of lease-adjusted debt: the part of the debt that cash on hand could repay at once.(Cash + short-term investments) / lease-adjusted debt

Reconciliation of the Credit Figures

Item	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Borrowings	$35.7bn	$30.0bn	$28.8bn	$23.2bn	$26.4bn
Lease liabilities	$23.0bn	$23.8bn	$33.8bn	$37.1bn	$43.4bn
Borrowings and lease liabilities presented as one line	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Lease-adjusted debt	$58.7bn	$53.8bn	$62.6bn	$60.3bn	$69.8bn
EBIT	$37.6bn	$57.1bn	$38.0bn	$26.9bn	$26.1bn
Depreciation and amortisation, with the impairment reported with them	$11.7bn	$13.2bn	$13.3bn	$12.5bn	$15.1bn
Share-based payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Adjusted EBITDA	$49.3bn	$70.3bn	$51.3bn	$39.4bn	$41.3bn
Cash interest	−$2.2bn	−$1.9bn	−$2.0bn	−$1.9bn	−$1.8bn
Cash taxes	−$2.1bn	−$11.5bn	−$10.0bn	−$6.9bn	−$5.0bn
Funds from operations	$44.9bn	$57.0bn	$39.3bn	$30.5bn	$34.4bn

Method

Total debt is borrowings and lease liabilities, current and non-current, before the deduction of cash. Under IFRS 16 every lease is on the balance sheet, depreciation includes that of right-of-use assets and finance costs include the interest on lease liabilities, so no lease cost or lease interest is added.
Adjusted EBITDA adds share-based payments, and the impairment that the company reports with depreciation and amortisation, to EBIT and depreciation and amortisation. FFO deducts cash interest and cash taxes.
S&P applies its table to its own adjusted figures, which also deduct surplus cash and adjust for pensions and other items, so the band of an S&P calculation can differ.

Liquidity and MaturitiesCash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.

Cash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Debt due within 12 monthsBorrowings and lease liabilities due within the next 12 months, which the company must repay or refinance.Current borrowings + current lease liabilities, or the current line that presents them together

Method

Debt due within 12 months is current borrowings and current lease liabilities.
Capital expenditure and dividends of the fiscal year are taken as those of the next 12 months. Undrawn credit facilities are not included.

Earnings QualityCash-flow accruals −8.1%, Operating cash flow to EBITDA 0.87x · FY2025

Accruals and the cash backing of reported earnings.

Operating cash flow for fiscal 2025 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 8.1% of average total assets.
Interpretation. The profit came in as cash: operating cash flow was larger than net income. Profit backed by cash tends to repeat more than profit made of accounting entries (Sloan, 1996).
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023−8.1% from −15.3% in FY2024
Rule: Cash backing of earnings · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedOperating cash flow for fiscal 2025 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 8.1% of average total assets.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedOperating cash flow for fiscal 2024 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 15.3% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewOperating cash flow for fiscal 2023 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 9.1% of average total assets.Reconstructed · initial

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Cash-flow accrualsNet income less operating cash flow, against average assets: the part of profit not received in cash in the same period. Research associates high accruals with lower earnings in later years; a negative figure means cash exceeded profit.(Net income attributable to the company - operating cash flow) / average total assets
Balance sheet accrualsThe same gap between profit and cash, measured from the changes in the balance sheet (Sloan, 1996).[(Change in current assets - change in cash) - (change in current liabilities - change in short-term debt - change in taxes payable) - depreciation and amortisation] / average total assets (Sloan, 1996)
Total accrualsAccruals that also cover long-term operating and financial assets and liabilities (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005). Acquisitions raise the figure.Change in net operating working capital, net non-current operating assets and net financial assets / average total assets (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005)
Operating cash flow to EBITDAOperating cash flow against EBITDA: the part of operating profit before depreciation that turns into cash after interest, tax and changes in stock, receivables and payables.Operating cash flow / (operating income + depreciation and amortisation)

Method

Cash-flow accruals are net income attributable to the company less operating cash flow, over average total assets. Balance sheet accruals follow Sloan (1996) and total accruals Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna (2005).
Balance sheet and total accruals include the assets and liabilities that acquisitions bring in and disposals take out; cash-flow accruals exclude them.

Forensic and Distress ScoresAltman Z'' 2.70, Beneish −2.49 · Piotroski 7 of 9 · FY2022

Published distress and misstatement models, with their original coefficients and thresholds.

The Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2022 was 2.70, above the safe threshold of 2.60.
Interpretation. By this model, the balance sheet and earnings look like those of companies that did not go bankrupt in its original study: above 2.60 means safe, below 1.10 distress.
Newin FY2022 · first stated
Rule: Altman Z'' zone · Sources 20-F 2023-12, 20-F 2024-12
History of this finding, 1 record
1. FY2022 NewThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2022 was 2.70, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · initial
The Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 was minus 2.49, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.
Interpretation. The model finds no sign of earnings manipulation. Beneish (1999) set a threshold of minus 1.78, above which a company resembles the companies that manipulated their earnings.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023−2.49 from −3.75 in FY2024
Rule: Beneish M-score against its threshold · Sources 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 was minus 2.49, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2024 was minus 3.75, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2023 was minus 2.54, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · initial
The Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 7 of 9. The 2 signals not met were long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier and margin higher than a year earlier.
Interpretation. The score counts how many of 9 tests of profit, debt, liquidity and efficiency the company passes. A score of 7 to 9 is the strongest group: Piotroski (2000) placed 0 to 3 in the weakest.
Newin FY2025 · first stated
Rule: Piotroski F-score · Sources 20-F 2024-12, 20-F 2025-12
History of this finding, 4 records
1. FY2025 NewThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 7 of 9. The 2 signals not met were long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier and margin higher than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
2. FY2025 RetiredThe finding changed to a high score.Recorded from FY2025_bc22456d · data update
3. FY2024 ConfirmedThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2024 was 5 of 9. The 4 signals not met were return on assets higher than a year earlier, current ratio higher than a year earlier, margin higher than a year earlier and asset turnover higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
4. FY2023 NewThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2023 was 5 of 9. The 4 signals not met were return on assets higher than a year earlier, long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier, current ratio higher than a year earlier and asset turnover higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Altman Z'' scoreA measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.6.56 x working capital / total assets + 3.26 x retained earnings / total assets + 6.72 x EBIT / total assets + 1.05 x total equity / total liabilities (Altman, 1995); distress zone below 1.10, safe zone above 2.60	n/a	safe zone	n/a	n/a	n/a
Beneish M-scoreA screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.-4.84 + 0.920 DSRI + 0.528 GMI + 0.404 AQI + 0.892 SGI + 0.115 DEPI - 0.172 SGAI + 4.679 TATA - 0.327 LVGI (Beneish, 1999); model threshold -1.78	below threshold	below threshold	below threshold	below threshold	below threshold
Dechow F-scoreThe probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.Predicted probability of a misstatement (model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan, 2011) / 0.0037, the unconditional probability; 1 equals the base rate	n/a
Piotroski F-scoreA count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.Number of 9 binary signals met on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, equity issuance, margin and asset turnover (Piotroski, 2000)	n/a

Altman Z'' Score

fiscal 2022

A measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.

Distress zone, below 1.10

Grey zone, 1.10 to 2.60

2.70Safe zone, above 2.60

The score of 2.70 is in the safe zone of the model, above 2.60. The largest part is operating profit, at 2.05.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Working capital / total assetsCurrent assets less current liabilities, against total assets: the short-term funds available for operations.	−0.001	6.560	−0.005
Retained earnings / total assetsProfits kept in the business over its life, against total assets.	0.009	3.260	0.029
EBIT / total assetsOperating profit against total assets: the earning power of the assets.	0.305	6.720	2.050
Total equity / total liabilitiesBook equity against liabilities: how far the assets could fall in value before liabilities exceed them.	0.595	1.050	0.625
Score			2.700

Altman, Hartzell and Peck (1995), for non-manufacturing companies. The model omits the ratio of sales to total assets of the 1968 model and uses book equity. Working capital below zero and equity reduced by share repurchases lower the score.

Beneish M-score

fiscal 2025

A screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.

−2.49Below the threshold, −1.78 and below

Above the threshold, above −1.78

The score of minus 2.49 is below the model threshold of minus 1.78. Of the 8 measures, receivables against sales raises the score most.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Intercept			−4.840
Days sales in receivables indexReceivables against sales, against a year earlier. A rise can mean sales recorded before customers pay.	1.330	0.920	1.223
Gross margin indexGross margin a year earlier against the current gross margin. Above 1, margins fell, which the model treats as a risk factor.	1.056	0.528	0.558
Asset quality indexAssets other than current assets and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets, against a year earlier. A rise can mean more costs recorded as assets.	1.002	0.404	0.405
Sales growth indexSales against a year earlier. The model treats fast growth as a risk factor.	0.976	0.892	0.870
Depreciation indexThe rate of depreciation a year earlier against the current rate. Above 1, depreciation slowed, which raises profit.	1.014	0.115	0.117
Selling, general and administrative expenses indexOverheads against sales, against a year earlier.	1.000	−0.172	−0.172
Total accruals to total assetsNet income less operating cash flow, against total assets: profit not backed by cash. It carries the largest coefficient in the model.	−0.074	4.679	−0.345
Leverage indexDebt against total assets, against a year earlier.	0.948	−0.327	−0.310
Score			−2.494

Beneish (1999), estimated on 74 companies identified as earnings manipulators in SEC enforcement releases and the press for 1982 to 1992, against 2,332 Compustat companies. The model classes a score above minus 1.78 with the first group. An index whose inputs are not reported counts as 1.

Dechow F-score

fiscal 2025

The probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.

A score of 0.16 means a probability of a misstatement 0.16 times the average rate in the Dechow sample: 0.06% against 0.37%.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Intercept			−7.893
Total accruals (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna)Total accruals: the growth of operating and financial assets net of liabilities, against average assets.	0.066	0.790	0.052
Change in receivables / average total assetsThe growth of receivables against average assets.	0.005	2.518	0.013
Change in inventories / average total assetsThe growth of stock against average assets.	0.007	1.191	0.009
Assets other than cash and property, plant and equipment / total assetsAssets other than cash and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets: assets whose value depends more on judgement.	0.215	1.979	0.426
Change in cash salesThe growth of sales collected in cash.	−0.062	0.171	−0.011
Change in return on assetsThe change in return on assets against a year earlier. A fall raises the score.	0.059	−0.932	−0.055
Debt or equity issued in the year, 1 or 01 when the company issued shares or debt in the year.	0.000	1.029	0.000
Predicted value			−7.459
Probability of a misstatement			0.06%

Model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan (2011), estimated on misstatements named in SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. The score is the predicted probability of a misstatement over 0.37%, the unconditional probability in their sample, so 1.00 equals that base rate.

Piotroski F-score

fiscal 2025

A count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.

7 of the 9 tests are met, in the high group of 7 to 9.

Signal	FY2025	FY2024
Return on assets above zero	Met	Met
Operating cash flow above zero	Met	Met
Return on assets higher than a year earlier	Met	Not met
Operating cash flow above net income	Met	Met
Long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier	Not met	Met
Current ratio higher than a year earlier	Met	Not met
No common equity issued	Met	Met
Margin higher than a year earlier	Not met	Not met
Asset turnover higher than a year earlier	Met	Not met

Piotroski (2000), 9 signals on profitability, funding and operating efficiency, designed for companies with high book-to-market ratios. Piotroski grouped scores of 8 and 9 as high and 0 and 1 as low; the findings group 7 to 9 and 0 to 3.

Source Documents

Documents of this snapshot, latest first.

Document	Date	Id
20-F for the year to 31 December 2025	9 Apr 2026	20-F:0001292814-26-002168
20-F for the year to 31 December 2024	3 Apr 2025	20-F:0001292814-25-001352
20-F for the year to 31 December 2023	12 Apr 2024	20-F:0001292814-24-001340
20-F for the year to 31 December 2022	29 Mar 2023	20-F:0001292814-23-001253
20-F for the year to 31 December 2021	30 Mar 2022	20-F:0001292814-22-001285

Checks

215211 of 215 checks passed, 4 warnings

Fiscal calendar11 passedFiscal years last 350 to 380 days, and each starts on the day after the one before. Checked at error level.

Coverage2 passedThe latest fiscal year gives total assets and a profit figure. Checked at error level.

Balance sheet identity6 passedTotal assets equal total liabilities and equity at each balance sheet date. Checked at error level.

Gross profit6 passedRevenue less cost of sales equals the gross profit that the company presents. A gross profit that differs is withheld, and so is a cost of sales that the company gives without gross profit. Checked at warning level.

Earnings per share6 passedProfit divided by earnings per share gives a number of shares in line with the other years. Checked at warning level.

Agreement between annual reports180 passedA value of a year that the annual report of the year and that of the next year give in the same amount. A value that the later report gives differently is listed as a restatement, and the later value is used. Checked at warning level.

Withheld values4 values withheldA value that contradicts the definition of its item, or that documents report in contradiction, is withheld. Checked at warning level.

Research and development expense, FY2020: withheld, reported with opposite signs

Finance costs, FY2020: withheld, reported with opposite signs

Research and development expense, FY2021: withheld, reported with opposite signs

Finance costs, FY2021: withheld, reported with opposite signs

Data Quality

How many values of this snapshot the checks prove, and how many Annalist derives, withholds and tracks as restated. Every company.

Values published	244
Confirmed by other figures	77.0%, 188 values
Confirmed by a second document	73.8%, 180 values
Derived from reported figures	0.0%, 0 values
Values withheld	4
Restated figures tracked	2
Changes compared on one basis	0
Company lines mapped	0 of 0 reviewed

Citation

Annalist, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), snapshot petrobras/FY2025_21f63538 (as of FY2025); <item label>, <period>; source <document id> (<document url>)

Snapshot FY2025_21f63538 · dataset SHA-256 21f63538a55c30dddef821cc5bc7c997b0684e700a6a4c11534f6b6c158d1297 · findings rules 0.5

Data: info.json · dataset.json · validation.json · documents.json